so I was a little concerned when I read ebert's rating of 2 and a half stars. after seeing it for myself, I'll have to say, he was being generous. If you thought that the James Bond reboot was handled poorly, man, do I have bad news for you. From actions scenes filmed in no less then 50 cuts per 5 minute scene, to a bridge that has more lense flares then a poorly coded myspace page, the new star trek movie will wow you with it's lack of attention to <i>purely scientific</i> details, or the inability of the plot to engage you at any time. The main bad guy apparently was lost in space for 25 years, but pshh, didn't age a day. He was going to go kill Spock at one point, but then just left him on an ice planet (where spock just slept in an ice cave, instead of the starfleet base a short walk away), and then seemed to forget about 'old' spock and decided to rush after 'young' spock, who was upset that his mother had been vaporized due to a 2 foot drop.
Tiki's rating: one star, and that's only because there was a green girl in her underwear, and that's it. This is not a good movie, and replaces Nemesis on my 'worst star trek movie ever' list.
